Impact of Logic in Architectural Design Process on Architecture Identity

Authors

  • Hawar Abdullah Yousif Architectural Engineering Department, University of Duhok, Duhok, Iraq
  • Abdullah Yousif Tayib Architectural Engineering Department, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25098/9.1.27

Keywords:

Logic, Design Method, Design Process, Architecture Identity

Abstract

The research deals with the concept of logic as a design approach that affects the architecture identity. The research question is: “Does logic in architectural design process affect the architecture identity?”. By reviewing many studies that have dealt with the concept of logic in the architectural design process, it became clear that they did not shed light on this complex relationship between it and the architecture identity. Hence, the research problem arose and the gap emerged, which is the lack of scientific knowledge of the relationship between logic as a design method and the concept of architectural identity. The research aims to answer the question by clarifying this relationship to know the extent of the relationship between the variables by building a theoretical framework that explains the logic in the architectural design process and the architecture identity, in addition to conducting a practical study that includes a graphic analysis of architectural models in the city of Dohuk - Iraqi Kurdistan. The research methodology included the following: determining the architectural design variables extracted from the theoretical framework (basic geometric shapes, monomorphic or unified shape, ornaments and manufactured details, smooth finishes, pattern repetition, orthogonal grid, golden ratio, new manufactured materials, compatible binary colors, and continuous or strip windows) in addition to determining the research sample, measurement method, statistical and graphic analysis of variables. The results showed that there is a tendency towards logical and rational architecture by focusing on the use of the aforementioned vocabulary in the stages of the design process. These variables also varied in the intensity of their impact on the identity of architecture, and this indicates the difference in the intensity of their effectiveness in achieving this. The conclusion shows how the use of these variables and the focus on them in the logical stages of the architectural design process (analysis, synthesis, and evaluation) negatively affects the failure to highlight the identity and character of architecture through the production of buildings devoid of architectural meanings and connotations lacking local and cultural identity and regional distinction.

References

Abel, C.(2000). Architecture and Identity: Responses to Cultural and Technological Change. 2nd ed. New York: Architectural Press.

Alexander, C. (1973). Notes on the synthesis of form. London: Oxford University Press.

Aksehir, T. S. (2003). A Study on Architectural Elements of Space Identity:Atakule. Published M.Sc. Thesis, Bilkent University,

Ankara. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/52939707.pdf

AL-Daheen, H. A. (1994). The influence of Design Factors on Students Behavior in Universities Central Libraries. Unpublished

M.Sc. Thesis, University of Technology, Bagdad, Iraq.

Al-Sulaivany, H. A. (2011). The Effect of University Buildings Characteristics on Students Behavior. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis,

University of Duhok, Iraq.

Broadbent, G. (1988). Design in Architecture: Architecture and the Human Sciences. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Banham, R. (1975). Age of the Masters: a personal view of modern architecture. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

Banham, R. (1989). Age of the Masters: a personal view of modern architecture. Translated into Arabic by Suad Abd Ali. Baghdad

Dar Al-Ma'moun for translation and publishing.

Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work .2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. 3rd ed. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Correa, C. (1983). Quest for identity. Proceedings of the Seminar: Exploring Architecture in Islamic Cultures1, Architecture and

Identity. Singapore. Published for the Aga Khan Award for Architecture by Concept Media Pte Ltd.

De Vries, M.J., Cross, N. and Grant, D.P. (1993). Design Methodology and Relationships with Science. Dordrecht: Published by

Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Ettehad, Sh., Azeri, A.R. and Kari, Gh. (2014). The Role of Culture in Promoting Architectural Identity. European Online Journal

of Natural and Social Sciences. Vol.3, No.4. https://european-science.com/eojnss_proc/article/viewFile/4181/1903.%C2%A02003

Gregory, S. A. (1966). The Design Method. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

Gregory, P. A. (2017). Formal Logic. Ontario: Broadview press.

Hacihasanoglu, O. and Orer, G. (1998). Architectural and Urban Identities of Istanbul. Open House International. Vol. 23, No.1.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387998350_Architectural_and_urban_identites_of_Istanbul_-Open_House_International

Jones, J. C. (1992). Design Methods. 2nd ed. New York: john Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Lampugnani, V. (1986). Encyclopedia of 20th-century Architecture. New York: Published by Harry N. Abrams, Incorporated.

Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. 4th ed. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Linden, J. C., Lacerda, A. P. and Aguiar, J. P. (2011). The evolution of design methods. In 9th International Conference of the

European Academy of Design at: Porto (Portugal).

Langer, S. K. (1953). An Introduction to Symbolic logic. New York: Dover.

Mitchell, W. J. (1990). The Logic of Architecture: Design, Computation, and Cognition. London: MIT press.

Popper, K. (1961). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Scientific Editions.

Shirzad, S. (1999). Modern Architectural Movements: International Style in Architecture. Beirut: Published by Arabic foundation

for Studies & Publishing.

Tran, J. (2010). Static Illusions: Architectural Identity, Meaning and History. Perth: Curtin University.

Watson, G. B. and Bentley, I. (2007). Identity by Design. USA: Architectural Press.

Abowardah, E. S. and Khalil, O. M. (2016). Design process and strategic thinking in architecture. In Proceedings of 2nd

International Conference on Architecture, Structure and Civil Engineering (ICASCE). London.

Yilmaz, M. (2006). Architectural Identity and Local Community. Ekistics and the new habitat. Vol. 73, No. 436/441. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53910/26531313-E200673436-441109

Yousif, H. A. and Khalil, K. F. (2019). Impact of Talent Structure on Architectural Design Excellence. International Journal of

Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET). Volume 10, Issue 03. Article Id - IJCIET_10_03_064

Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment Behavior Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Abdullah Yousif , H. ., & Yousif Tayib , A. . (2025). Impact of Logic in Architectural Design Process on Architecture Identity. The Scientific Journal of Cihan University– Sulaimaniya, 9(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.25098/9.1.27