Genotypical Change of Traditional Houses in Sulaymaniyah City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25098/8.1.23Keywords:
Architecture genotype, Space syntax, Justified graph map, Traditional house layoutAbstract
Over the past thirty years, Sulaymaniyah City has experienced tremendous sociocultural and economic upheaval, which has led to substantial changes in both the urban and architectural layouts. There have been many traditional houses in the old city center that were destroyed and rebuilt with new structures, which has negatively impacted the form and spatial organization of the original fabric. This study aims to investigate how the contemporary reconstruction activities that landowners in traditional city neighborhoods undertake affect the basic genotype or genetic constants of housing spatial design. The research entails morphologically assessing the architectural arrangements of the rebuilt and original structures. In order to achieve this goal, five distinct designs of traditional homes built in the years 1900–1960 were selected and compared with five newly reconstructed modern homes from the years 1990–2020 in the same area. Using (A-graph software) as a space syntax technique, specifically (Gamma analysis), the spatial arrangements of these structures were assessed using an analytical quantitative approach to ascertain the layout characteristics such as (symmetry/asymmetry) and (distributiveness/non-distributiveness) of the entire system. The results show that, whereas many organizing principles are common, there are distinct structuring patterns based on genotype differences.
References
Abdullah, W. S., Shari, A. N. M., 2019. Distortion of Local Architecture Identity A comparative study for the rebuilding process of the buildings on Sabunkaran street. Sulaimania. Journal for Engineering Sciences, 6(3), pp. 47-58. doi.org/10.17656/sjes.10099.
Hanson, Julienne., 2003. Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge university press.
Rzaij, W.A., Khudair, B.H., 2022. Assessment Strategies of Fixed Firefighting system in Residential Multi-Story Building for Improving Fire Safety: A Review. Journal of Engineering 28(6), pp. 53–64. doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2022.06.05
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., 1989. The social logic of space. Cambridge university press.
Elizondo, L. A, 2022. Justified Plan Graph Analysis of Social Housing in Mexico (1974–2019): Spatial Transformations and Social Implications. Nexus Netw J, 24, pp. 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00568-7
Rahmane, A., Abbaoui, M.,2021. The Architectural Genotype Approach in Contemporary Housing (1995 to 2010). Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 11(1), pp. 6810–6818. doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4006
Hillier, B., Leaman, A., 1974. How is design possible: A sketch for a theory. DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods, 8(1), pp. 40–50.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., 1984. The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge Univ. Pr.
Steadman, P., 2008. The evolution of designs: biological analogy in architecture and the applied arts. Routledge.
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., Graham, H., 1987. Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14(4), pp. 363–385. doi.org/10.1068/b140363
Bafna, S., 1999. The morphology of early modernist residential plans: Geometry and genotypical trends in Mies van der Rohe’s designs. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Space Syntax, 1, 1.
Edwards, B., Sibley, M., Hakmi, M., Land, P., 2004. The power of the veil: gender inequality in the domestic setting of traditional courtyard. In Courtyard Housing. pp. 109–123. Taylor & Francis. doi.org/10.4324/9780203646724
Guney, Y. I., 2005. Appropriated ‘a la Franga’: An examination of Turkish modernization through the lens of domestic culture. PhD. thesis submited to the University of Michigan.
Mustafa, F. A., Hassan, A. S., Baper, S. Y., 2010. Using space syntax analysis in detecting privacy: a comparative study of traditional and modern house layouts in Erbil city, Iraq. Asian Social Science, 6(8), pp. 157-166. DOI:10.5539/ass.v6n8p157
Seo, K. W., 2017. Finding Housing Genotypes by Graph Theory: An Investigation into Malay Houses. In Morphological Analysis of Cultural DNA, pp. 37–47. Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-2329-3_4
Raith, K., Estaji, H., 2020. Traditional House Types Revived and Transformed: A Case Study in Sabzevar, Iran. In Urban Heritage Along the Silk Roads. pp. 157–173. Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-22762-3_11
Hanson, J., 1998. Chapter Eight ‘The anatomy of privacy in architects’ London houses’. Decoding Homes and Houses, pp. 215–241.
Cunha, V., 2012. Can genotype patterns change over time. In: International Space Syntax Symposium, 8.
Hillier, B., 2007. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture.Space Syntax.
Bustard, W., 1999. Space, evolution, and function in the houses of Chaco Canyon. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), pp. 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1068/b4325
Roesler, C., 2012. Are archetypes transmitted more by culture than biology? Questions arising from conceptualizations of the archetype. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 57(2), pp. 223–246. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01963.x
Abdullah, W. S., Qaradahi, A. M. A., 2021. Measurable Mistakes in Architecture the Effect of Designer's Experience on the Propagation of Mistakes in Architectural Design - Residential Buildings in Al Sulaymaniyah City as a Case Study. Journal of Engineering, 24(1), pp. 89-111. doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2021.01.07
Sari, I.K.; Nuryanti, W.; Ikaputra, I. Phenotype, 2020. Genotype and Environment in Architecture Case Study: Traditional Malay House, West Borneo. Preprints 2020, 2020050034. doi.org/10.20944/preprints202005.0034.v1
Ledent, G., 2017. Permanence to allow change. The archetypal room: The persistence of the 4× 4 room. In Architectural Research Addressing Societal Challenges, pp. 339–344. CRC Press. DOI:10.1201/9781315226255-54
Byun, N., Choi, J., 2016. A Typology of Korean Housing Units: In Search of Spatial Configuration. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(1), pp. 41–48. doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.41
Amorim, L., 2001. Houses of Recife: From diachrony to synchrony. Proceeding of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, 1–7.
Noble, A., 2009. Traditional buildings: a global survey of structural forms and cultural functions. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mohamed Salih A., 2019. The Characters of the FormintheVernacular ArchitectureA comparative study oftheform's charactersof facades ofindividual houses and commercial buildingsin the City of Baghdad after 2003–Zayoonadistrictas a case study. Journal of Engineering, 25(7), pp. 145–164. doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2019.07.09
Qaradaghi, A. M. A., 2020. The effect of rural building types informing the type of traditional courtyard houses in Sulaimaneyah city. Journal of the Planner & Development, 42.
Alhilli, H. K., Rezouki, S.E., 2022. The Causes Influencing the Occurrence of Variation Orders in the Construction of Buildings. Journal of Engineering, 27(8), pp. 34–53. doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2022.08.03
Ostwald, M. J., Dawes, M. J., 2018. The Mathematics of the Modernist Villa: Architectural Analysis Using Space Syntax and Isovists. (Vol. 3). Springer.
Peponis, J., 1985. The spatial culture of factories. Human Relations, 38(4), pp. 357–390. doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800405
Klarqvist, B., 1993. A Space Syntax Glossary. Nordisk Arkitektur for Skning,(2). 11, 12.
Guney, Y. I., Wineman, J., 2008. The evolving design of 20th-century apartments in Ankara. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(4), pp. 627–646.
doi.org/10.1068/b340
Al-Sayed, K., Turner, A., Hillier, B., Iida, S., Penn, A., 2014. Space syntax methodology. Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL: London, UK.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SJCUS's open access articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.