Hypothesis Priori and A Posteriori Epistemic in Denotation and Connotation

Authors

  • Trifa Omer Ahmed Department of Translation, College of Language, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimaniya, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25098/6.2.4

Keywords:

Denotation, Connotation, Proposition, Analytical Judgment, Synthetical Judgment, Posteriori, Epistemic, Priori episteme

Abstract

Relating Language to philosophy, this domain has a few research in Kurdish linguistics, this article (Hypothesis Priori and A Posteriori Epistemic in Denotation and Connotation), it is the first primary scientific work which presume how judging our thoughts with use lexicon our language, so that might afford logical perception in context for language.

This research focuses on this question, “to what extend speaker expand their thought domain by language?” for this takes both priori and a posteriori episteme and it became measure then it related and analysis to both kinds meaning denotation and connotation. 

For do these, the research divided into two sections, the first section dedicated to brief illustrating epistemology, in the second section, explain how to use denotation and connotation relate priori and a posteriori episteme, then according to a verity of epistemic crowd of denotation and connotation explain the type of governing. 

This research depends on approach (Descriptive- Analysis) and by them receive three hypotheses as a conclusion.

References

بە زمانی كوردی

• ئیمانیۆل كانت، و: سۆران عومه‌ر حه‌مه‌، ره‌خنه‌ى عه‌قڵى په‌تى، له‌ بڵاوكراوه‌كانى نێوه‌ندى رۆشنگه‌رى بۆ لێكۆڵینه‌وه‌ى فكرى و سیاسى، 2014، كوردستان.

• حه‌مید عه‌زیز، بنه‌ماكانى فه‌لسه‌فه‌ى شیكردنه‌وه‌ى مه‌نتیقى، چاپی یه‌كه‌م، ده‌زگاى چاپ و بڵاوكردنه‌وه‌ى موكریان، 2005، هه‌ولێر.

• شیلان عومەر حسین، ئیدیۆم و چەشن و پێکهاتنی لە زمانی کوردیدا، ٢٠٠٧، نامەی ماستەر، زانكۆی سلێمانی

• محمه‌دى محوى، زانستى هێماو هێما- واتاو واتالێكدانه‌وه‌، به‌رگى دووهه‌م، چاپخانه‌ى په‌یوه‌ند، 2009، سلێمانى.

بە زمانی عەرەبی

• جايستون باشلار، ابستتمولوجيا- نصوص مختارة في ابستمولوجيا، ، ترجمة والتقديم درويش حلوجي، طبعة الاولى ، القاهرة،1998

• فهد بن عبدالله الچویحی، إداره‌ المعرفه‌ فی المكتبات ومراكز المعلومات : النظرية‌ التطبيق، سبراریه‌نس جورنال، العدد 20، سبتمبر 2009.

بە زمانی ئینگلیزی

• Chomisky, Knowledge of Language: Its Elements and Origins, 1981, Jstor, US

• Evans, V. & Green, M. Cognitive Linguistics An introduction, 2006, Edinburgh university press.

• David Crystal, A dictionary of linguistics & Phonetics, fifth edition, 2003, Blackwell publishing.

• James R. Huford, Semantics, 2nd edition, 2007, Cambridge university press.

• John Lyons, Linguistic Semantics an introduction, 1996, Cambridge university press.

• Nonako. I& Takeuchi. H, The knowledge creating company, Newyourk, oxford university press.

• Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds.) Developmental Pragmatics.1979. New York: Academic Press.

ماڵپەڕ

http://www.journal.cybrarians.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=457:2011-08-11-22-22-29&catid=133:2009-05-20-09-50-11&Itemid=61

• Chris Kimble، Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledgevol. 18 no. 2, June, 2013

http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-2/paper577.html#.V5QLiBKy4Yg

• file:///C:/Users/Asia/AppData/Local/Temp/INDUCTIVEDEDUCTIVERESEARCHAPPROACH050320083001201426022019.pdf

Published

2023-02-18

How to Cite

Omer Ahmed, T. (2023). Hypothesis Priori and A Posteriori Epistemic in Denotation and Connotation. The Scientific Journal of Cihan University– Sulaimaniya, 6(2), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.25098/6.2.4

Issue

Section

Articles Vol6 Issue2